Tactical Asset Allocation Views (February 2020)

Tactical Asset Allocation Views (February 2020)

Tactical Asset Allocation Views (February 2020)

Tactical Asset Allocation Views (February 2020)

Manji February 29, 2020

The coronavirus presents a sudden exogenous shock to the global growth cycle at a time when the world economy was on the cusp of a synchronized cyclical upswing. This negative shock led to a noticeable decline in our market sentiment indicator, with a drastic drawdown in future growth expectations, particularly in China and the rest of emerging Asia (Figures 1 and 2). In our last update, our leading economic indicators suggested that this region was likely to lead the potential global recovery. However, the regional concentration of the coronavirus directly challenges this thesis, at least for now. In light of this new information, our framework places the global economy in a contraction regime for the near term (i.e., growth below-trend and expected to decelerate). The duration of this regime will likely depend on two things: 1) the duration of the virus outbreak and 2) its impact on the economy.

1. Duration of the virus outbreak: likely over by the spring

The virus alone is unlikely to derail the global growth outlook for 2020, as it is reasonable to assume the outbreak will follow the typical path of any seasonal flu, which hits most of the northern hemisphere this time of year and largely runs its course within 2-3 months (i.e., by the spring). In fact, this is also what we experienced with SARS in 2003, when markets took a hit in the winter months before running  its course by mid-April. Therefore, by itself, the outbreak can be considered a temporary economic event.

2. Impact on the economy: temporary and longer-lasting shocks

China and the rest of Asia are likely to see the most pronounced decline in growth for Q1 2020, as economic activity is disrupted from quarantines, factories shutdowns and canceled transportation services. Revenues from consumer spending, travel and tourism services are likely to suffer the most given most celebrations were canceled for the Lunar New Year holidays.  However, this should only be a one-off, temporary drag on growth. That said, the industrial sector is likely to experience both a near-term and elongated shock to growth. The loss of Chinese output in Q1 may lead to a sharp drawdown in inventories, followed by a similarly sharp rebound in production in Q2 and Q3, depending on the degree of disruption to global supply chains and global demand outside the region. Given the large share of global GDP coming from China today (~18% compared to 5% in 2003), the impact on global growth is likely to be larger than the SARS epidemic. On the bright side, the meaningful decline in industrial commodity and energy prices (10% year-to-date) may provide some support to industrial and consumer demand going forward.

In summary, over the next few months, we expect our leading economic indicators to deteriorate—especially in China and emerging markets and play “catch-up” with the information already baked into the market. The impact on our developed markets leading indicators will likely be more modest, but negative nonetheless. More importantly, we will continue to monitor trends in global risk appetite to gauge whether economic data will surprise positively or negatively versus financial markets expectations. 

Exhibit 1: Coronavirus shock to market sentiment
challenges the nascent growth recovery, increasing near-term downside risks in
a below-trend growth environment.

Sources: Bloomberg L.P., MSCI, Citi, Barclays, JPMorgan, Invesco Investment Solutions research and calculations, from January 1992 to January 2020. The Global Leading Economic Indicator (LEI) is a proprietary, forward-looking measure of the macroeconomic trend level. The Global Risk Appetite Cycle Indicator (GRACI) is a proprietary measure of the markets’ risk sentiment.

Exhibit 2: Leading Indicators likely to dip back into
contraction, especially for China and emerging markets.

Source: Invesco Investment Solutions team proprietary research, January 2020.

Following these developments, we have rotated a portion of our equity exposure in the Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund from emerging to developed markets, resulting in a net underweight EM position relative to the benchmark1 (Figure 3). The recent deterioration in the macro environment has also led to a meaningful outperformance in defensive equity factors such as quality and low volatility, which we expect to continue in an environment of increasing risk aversion and downward revisions to growth. Finally, barring renewed easing rhetoric by global central banks, the decline in bond yields over the past month and recurrence of flattening yield curves seem to appropriately reflect the increased risk aversion in the markets.

Exhibit 3: Global Allocation Strategy positioning
Allocations as of February 1, 2020

Source: Invesco, 2/1/2020. Portfolio allocations are displayed in terms of notional value and may exceed 100% as a result of exposure to derivatives. Notional Allocation refers to exposure gained through the use of derivative instruments when there is not an offsetting cash position. Holdings are subject to change and do not represent a recommendation from Invesco Ltd.


1. 60% MSCI ACWI & 40% The Bloomberg Barclays Global
Aggregate Bond Index (USD Hedged)

All data sources from Bloomberg L.P. as of 1/31/2020, unless
otherwise stated.


measures interest rate sensitivity. The
longer the duration, the greater the expected volatility as rates change.

MSCI ACWI Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large- and
mid-cap stocks across developed and emerging markets. The index is computed
using the net return, which withholds applicable taxes for non-resident

Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of global
investment-grade, fixed-income markets.

The opinions expressed are those of Alessio de Longis as
of January 14, 2020, are based on current market conditions and are subject to
change without notice. These opinions may differ from those of other Invesco
investment professionals.

Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate
the risk of loss.

MSCI Inc. Neither MSCI nor any other party involved in or
related to compiling, computing or creating the MSCI data makes any express or
implied warranties or representations with respect to such data (or the results
to be obtained by the use thereof), and all such parties hereby expressly
disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of such data. Without
limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or
any third party involved in or related to compiling, computing or creating the
data have any liability for any direct, indirect, special, punitive,
consequential or any other damages (including lost profits) even if notified of
the possibility of such damages. No further distribution or dissemination of
the MSCI data is permitted without MSCI’s express written consent.

In general, stock values fluctuate,
sometimes widely, in response to activities specific to the company as well as
general market, economic and political conditions.

The risks of investing in
securities of foreign issuers, including emerging market issuers, can include
fluctuations in foreign currencies, political and economic instability, and
foreign taxation issues.

Derivatives may be more volatile
and less liquid than traditional investments and are subject to market,
interest rate, credit, leverage, counterparty and management risks. An
investment in a derivative could lose more than the cash amount invested.

Interest rate risk refers to the
risk that bond prices generally fall as interest rates rise and vice versa.

An issuer may be unable to meet
interest and/or principal payments, thereby causing its instruments to decrease
in value and lowering the issuer’s credit rating.

Junk bonds involve a greater risk
of default or price changes due to changes in the issuer’s credit quality. The
values of junk bonds fluctuate more than those of high-quality bonds and can
decline significantly over short time periods.

Because the Subsidiary is not
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (1940 Act), the
Fund, as the sole investor in the Subsidiary, will not have the protections
offered to investors in U.S. registered investment companies.

The performance of an investment
concentrated in issuers of a certain region or country is expected to be closely
tied to conditions within that region and to be more volatile than more
geographically diversified investments.

The Fund is subject to certain
other risks. Please see the current prospectus for more information regarding
the risks associated with an investment in the Fund.

Invesco Distributors, Inc. is the US distributor for
Invesco Ltd.’s retail products and collective trust funds, and is an indirect,
wholly owned subsidiary of Invesco Ltd.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *